You've had the camera available long enough-available in Asia since February, and in the U.S. But we expect you to do it, with mainstream products (and they don't get more so than the Canon G1X). Of course we know we can create our own lens profiles, because you gave us versions of the tools that you use. that's thousands and thousands of dollars adding to their healthy bottom line earnings aren't what they were, but they're still near a billion dollars a year. We're not stupid, we Adobe consumers, who pay big bucks for initial licenses and then repeated big bucks for upgrades (I've upgraded Creative Suite five times since its original re-packaging as a suite. So at least for manual Geometry, I'd go with Capture 21.The redundant responses of Mr.Tranberry (the nature of which tends to leave me questioning the validity of the last word in his title if this is what a "Chief" is like, I wonder what the braves are like in the Customer Advocate team.) are what was called a non-response response, in the Nixon era (also the administration that invented the concept of "plausible deniability"), and in court would call for an admonition from the judge not to be non-responsive and answer the question. Too many horizontal lines (log cabin) and unstructured hand held source images. Sorry, long sentence.Īutomation was useless in this case. In a project to "manually" combine a number of individual NEF images into a complex perspective, only Capture 21 had the tools to correct the distortion (horz and vert) before feeding exported TIFFs into an Affinity Photo Panorama merge. Hard to answer unless one has attempted to use all three applications on the same image correction.
What do you think about those programs and their undistorting qualities? Thanks! Only DxO has "volume deformation" to avoid ugly deformations towards the image edges for instance of people.ViewPoint does undistort RAWs as well (excepting Fuji-Trans of course). Using DxO ViewPoint as stand-alone or as a LR plug-in, you can only import TIFFs, JPGs (RAWs from LR are converted).While at least DxO ViewPoint 3 has only one automatic (but those results can be dialled back or (as in LR) restricted to only horizontal/only vertical) (i believe ViewPoint 2 had 2 automatics) Lightroom has two automatics against skewed lines: Auto (moderate) and Full.Lightroom seems very intuitive, yet powerful.Some initial findings from me, if they are true at all: I'd like to know what you found interesting there, especially in comparison between 2 or 3 of the programs mentioned. Removal of converging lines and any skewed perspective automatically or manually.Removal of pincushion and barrel distortion automatically (lens profile) or manually.Hello, do you find a difference in Geometry/Transformation functions between
0 kommentar(er)
